Cloning - a Morale Dilemma

That's exactly what it is, a morale dilemma, but there is no argument. Humans should not be cloned.
Are there any uses to cloning animals/humans?

Well for animals there isn't really, cloning cattle would be too expensive and risky, I wouldn't want to eat one. A Jurassic Park sounds pretty cool though.

For humans?

If you know jack about Star Wars, you'd know that the clone army was cloned after Jango Fett, then turned on the Republic because of Order 66, but that's beside the point. Think how much it would suck to be a clone of a human. You would not live as long and you couldn't ever do anything fun because the whole world would be breathing down your neck everytime you went somewhere.You'd never be normal.

Frankenstein Haveyouever

Found refuge and consolation in nature? Yes
I do every weekend. I have to after going to school for 5 days. I can relax, It's peaceful and quiet until I blow the crap out of something.

Lost someone you loved? Yes
My dog Hector (Skal) who was killed by presumably a mountain lion, and there wasn't a whole lot of reason for him getting killed but that's life. He actually chased after it in the dark and my grandpa couldn't get to him in time.

"Madness in great ones must not unwatched go"

As long as there have been people, there have been societies that man has created for strength. Tribes, clans, towns, cities, you name it, they band together for a cause. Whether it be for marketing goods or just trying to survive, these groups have been essential since the beginning of time.

But in order for the groups to function, there must be some law or code to abide by, a figure of authority, a "government" no matter how small to keep things in check. They're not all democracies, most typically in a clan or tribe, there is a supreme leader, or dictator.He has the highest say in everything, and can even punish people to death.

People can become afraid of this figure. Sometimes so powerful, this one goes unchallenged in any matter by his government or people. Stalin for instance could walk into a room and have people clap for hours, no one wanting to stop, or Stalin might have to send his "police" to his house to make sure he was not a traitor, he might not be seen again. Rule by Fear was the law of the land, and it worked pretty good.

In history, rulers have abused their power in a way that didn't really help anyone else, or maybe they were loyal nationalists who loved their country and thought they could improve it, like Hitler.But he wasn't very fair to a lot of people, such as Jews.Not unlike the president of Iran, but he just said he was going to do that, which is why people need to keep an eye on him.Saddam, who had a beef with the Kurds started the Gulf War, and he got run outa town, then ended up getting himself killed for being a dumbass.Even North Korea is making a lot of tension.They are prime examples of why the people of a government have an obligation to have checks and balances on their leaders, sort of like what King Claudius said.

Nowadays it's more important than ever to monitor what our positions of power are doing in all nations to ensure the safety of the world as a whole. Sometimes force is necessary to keep order, but power can be abused and things could get out of hand and with today's weapons it could get ugly quick.

The Worst Adds On YV

Drugs directly to Consumers

Why or why not?

It's alright if the consumer knows what they're dealing with and are aware of the risks

.It sucks if they're not

Next Year

Next year I plan on going to Shasta College, maybe taking a diesel tech class, or something to get started in the Fish and Game field, but right now I'm leaning towards the diesel one.After that I don't know, I'm thinking about driving a truck for my dad, and then eventually own and drive my own truck; going into the Fish and Game seems fun but I think I'd make better money trucking.

Is the potential downside worth the risk with the LHC?
In other words, should scientists continue with turning it on?

Well DUH.If you had to pay for the thing you'd probably want to use it too.I don't know what exactly "they" hope to produce, but this awefully interesting when you think about it.

Sir Bedivere

Sir Bedivere is the knight of the Round Table who casts Excalibur into the water returning it to the Lady of the Lake.He helps Arthur and Kay fight the Giant of Mont St. Michel and war against Lucius of Rome.He has only one hand but he is an excellent warrior; in fact, he has been described as this:"and although he was one-handed no three warriors drew blood in the same field faster than he".